Top forest officer suspended by Tripura government for “Akbar-Sita” lions row

Spread the love
Top forest officer suspended by Tripura government for "Akbar-Sita" lions row
A top forest official named Prabin Lal Agrawal was suspended by the Tripura government on Monday in the midst of a scandal involving the naming of a lion and lioness in a zoo as “Akbar” and “Sita,” respectively.
The suspension occurred as a result of a lawsuit filed in Calcutta High Court by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), which claimed the names offended religious feelings.
As part of an animal exchange program, the big cats were named at Sepahijala Zoological Park in Tripura and sent to North Bengal Wild Animals Park in Siliguri, West Bengal, last week.

For what reason does this story matter?
The naming of the creatures sought discussion after the VHP recorded a writ request in the court, requesting that it address the claimed “sacrilege” and “an immediate attack on the strict convictions, everything being equal.”
It refered to a Bengali paper, Uttarbanga Sambad, which distributed the title “Sangir khoje astir Sita (Sita is fretful for a sidekick).”
Last week, a Calcutta HC judge noticed orally, “A creature ought not be named after any god or figure having a place with any religion.”

‘Sita can’t remain with Akbar’: VHP
Agrawal, a 1994-bunch Indian Woods Administrations (Uncertainties) official who was the state’s central untamed life superintendent, reported the names “Akbar” and “Sita” in the dispatch register prior to sending the lions to Siliguri.
Akbar was a popular Muslim leader of the Mughal Domain, while Sita is the spouse of Master Rama, a symbol of the god Vishnu, as indicated by the Hindu incredible Ramayana.
A VHP official, Anup Mondal, made sense of the outfit’s dissent and said, “Sita can’t remain with the Mughal Ruler Akbar.”

Calcutta HC questions choice on names
During a meeting — held last week — the Calcutta HC’s Jalpaiguri Circuit Seat scrutinized the choice to name the creatures “Sita” and “Akbar,” proposing that it ought to have been kept away from to forestall debate.
Equity Saugata Bhattacharyya inquired as to whether a lion could be named after figures like Master Vivekananda or Ramakrishna Paramahansa.
It likewise suggested that the West Bengal Zoo Authority rename the two creatures “shrewdly.”
He focused on that such contentions ought to have been kept away from and communicated dissatisfaction with regards to the picked names.

Court questions naming shows
Equity Bhattacharyya additionally addressed why naming the lioness Sita made a difference, as it might have been named out of friendship.
In any case, the advice for candidates contended that this was “defame,” not friendship. That’s what he added in the event that this was permitted, a jackass could be named after a god, as well.
The HC likewise widely scrutinized Extra Supporter General Debjyoti Choudhury on whether such naming shows could be permitted.

Government’s reaction
Lions moved to isolate fenced in areas to forestall struggle
The public authority informed the court that “Akbar” and “Sita” were assigned as “house names” or monikers for the creatures in the Tripura Zoo.
The specialists at the North Bengal Wild Creatures Park are currently considering renaming the creatures to keep away from additional discussion.
Quite, following the appeal, the lions were moved to isolate nooks to forestall any strict struggle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *