The Rs 27.60 crore IPO of Prodocs Solutions was a mix of fresh issue and offer for sale, with the company raising Rs 22.08 crore through new equity and promoters partially exiting via a Rs 5.52 crore offer for sale.
The issue received a moderate response, getting subscribed 2.66 times overall. Demand was strongest in the non-institutional investor segment, which was subscribed 4.61 times, while retail investors bid 2.38 times their allocation. Qualified institutional buyers subscribed their portion 1.59 times, reflecting selective institutional participation rather than broad-based enthusiasm.
Ahead of the public issue, Prodocs Solutions raised Rs 7.70 crore from anchor investors, providing a base level of confidence in the offering.
Prodocs Solutions operates in the IT-enabled services space, primarily focusing on non-voice BPO services. The company caters largely to overseas clients in the US and Australia, offering services such as title services for real estate and mortgage transactions, e-publishing solutions, indexing services and back-office support across finance, accounting and litigation domains.
Its business model is built around long-term client relationships and process-driven service delivery rather than volume-led scaling.
Financially, Prodocs Solutions has delivered steady profitability, though revenue growth has been uneven. For FY25, total income declined 6% to Rs 42.78 crore, even as profit after tax rose 61% to Rs 5.11 crore, driven by tighter cost controls and margin improvement. For the six months ended September 2025, the company reported revenue of Rs 21.11 crore and PAT of Rs 3.43 crore.The IPO proceeds from the fresh issue are expected to support working capital requirements and general corporate purposes, while also strengthening the company’s balance sheet.
Investors will closely track execution, client additions and margin sustainability to assess whether the company can gradually build value beyond the debut.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)