
According to the agency, the politician threatened to damage his company unless he paid the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for alleged bribes.
The accusation was made as the agency requested five days of incarceration for the politician.
For what reason does this story matter?
Both Reddy and Kavitha are individuals from the purported ‘South Gathering,’ which supposedly paid ₹100 crore to the AAP as a trade-off for a major portion of alcohol licenses under the now-rejected extract strategy.
These assets were utilized by the AAP for the gathering races in Goa, and critical measures of cash were given to AAP applicants in real money.
The Implementation Directorate (ED) has blamed Delhi Boss Priest Arvind Kejriwal for being a “key backstabber” for the situation.
Kavitha’s supposed associations with Delhi CM
The CBI claimed that Kavitha moved the cash to Vijay Nair, a nearby partner of the right now detained Delhi CM, Kejriwal.
The organization guarantees that a gathering occurred between a financial specialist from the “South Gathering,” Kejriwal, and later with Kavitha.
The CBI likewise states that Reddy became associated with the Delhi alcohol business subsequent to getting confirmations from Kavitha about her associations in the capital.
Kavitha’s supposed dangers and requests from Reddy
Further, the CBI kept up with that Kavitha told Reddy he expected to pay ₹25 crore for discount and an extra ₹5 crore for each zone to AAP.
At the point when Reddy delayed, it’s supposed that Kavitha compromised his business.
The organization accepts she should be interrogated further concerning subtleties revealed during their examination concerning the alcohol strategy.
Kavitha’s capture and addressing by CBI
Kavitha has been under the ED’s care since her capture in mid-Walk.
On Thursday, the CBI captured her in Tihar prison.
The office asserted that during her cross examination in Tihar Prison on Saturday, she didn’t give acceptable answers.
“She isn’t revealing the realities which are only as far as anyone is concerned even in the wake of being stood up to with proof,” it said.