The muted GMP signals that the market is not assigning a significant premium ahead of listing, especially in the backdrop of mixed listing performances in recent IPOs. The IPO was priced at Rs 212 per share, at the upper end of the price band.
The Rs 440 crore public issue, which was entirely a fresh issue, saw an overall subscription of 3.41 times during March 24-27, with demand largely driven by high-net-worth investors. While the non-institutional investor (NII) portion was subscribed 13.40 times, retail participation remained relatively modest at 1.44 times, reflecting cautious sentiment among smaller investors.
The company operates as a basmati rice processor and exporter with a diversified FMCG portfolio under its “Aeroplane” brand. While it has a presence across more than 38 countries and reported steady financial growth — with revenue rising to Rs 2,004 crore in FY25 and profit after tax at Rs 60.82 crore — concerns remain around its relatively thin margins and high dependence on rice exports.
Margins have improved in recent periods, with EBITDA margin expanding to over 10%, but profitability remains sensitive to commodity price cycles and export dynamics. The business also operates in a fragmented and highly competitive segment, which limits pricing power.
A large portion of the IPO proceeds — around Rs 400 crore — is earmarked for working capital requirements, indicating the capital-intensive nature of the business.
Brokerages have flagged valuation concerns, noting that the issue appears aggressively priced relative to peers. This, combined with only moderate overall subscription and weak retail interest, appears to be weighing on grey market sentiment.The near-flat GMP suggests that listing gains, if any, could remain limited, and the stock may see a largely flat to mildly positive debut unless broader market sentiment improves.
Investors will closely track institutional activity and early trading volumes on listing day for cues on post-listing direction, especially given the divergence between strong institutional demand and tepid retail participation.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)