According to Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, Rajasthan’s public health is seriously threatened by the approaching summer, but the state has not yet developed an action plan to stop the growing threat.
Court criticizes state’s inaction on heatwave measures
The court slammed the state for not implementing the “Heat Action Plan” made under the Rajasthan Climate Change Project, and for not taking steps to ensure effective implementation of scheme ‘Strengthening Health Systems Preparedness of Heat Related Illness (HRI) in India.’
The court also observed that no advisory has been issued to the State Health Department regarding impending heatwaves, which is essential for public welfare.
Inaction
Rajasthan High Court highlights state’s negligence
In a similar suo motu case that was decided last year, Justice Dhand noted that despite earlier orders, the state had failed to act. “Classic and glaring textbook example of obstinacy exhibited by the State Officials, who appear to consider themselves above and beyond the reach of the law,” he characterized it. The court listed a number of errors, including the absence of cooling areas at traffic signals and public locations.
Directive
Court directs action to address heatwave situation
The court has instructed the State Chief Secretary to form a coordination committee of representatives from various departments to investigate the case’s issues and develop a strategy. “Citizens of the State cannot be treated as cattle. Justice Dhand stated, “Every human being as well as every living being, be they animals or birds, has a right to life.”
Hearing
The court has an April 24 hearing. Furthermore, the court stated that the government cannot use the excuse of a lack of cash when it can spend millions on PR campaigns that are not always in the public interest.
“The government must prioritize spending its funds toward addressing public needs. Taxpayers’ money should be used to frame and implement public policies in the interest of public,” it said.
The court has listed the case for hearing on April 24, along with the earlier suo motu case.